Page Nav




Top 10 Popular Nigerian Lies with Enormous Staying Power

  By Farooq A. Kperogi

 By Farooq A. Kperogi

Twitter: @farooqkperogi

In Nigeria, once lies and historical myths take roots, they are almost always impossible to uproot. But the stubborn persistence of lies is no reason to give up on correcting them. Find below 10 oft-repeated lies with the most staying power in Nigeria.

1. That the Nigerian government banned history in secondary schools. In the last few years, the claim that the Nigerian government “banned history” from the national curriculum has become a hackneyed, predictable refrain, and is often uttered in moments of displays of historical ignorance, especially by young people. But this refrain is both dishonest and inaccurate. History was never a mandatory subject at any point in Nigeria’s history. It was always optional before it was discontinued in 2012 because of progressively dwindling student enrollment.

History and government were offered as alternatives to each other for students. That is, you enrolled in either history or government but not both. Most students chose government, which caused the ministry of education to discontinue offering history.

Nevertheless, even the secondary school history curriculum that students were taught was deficient, poorly focused, and incapable of nurturing the sort of historical knowledge that is indispensable to national self-fashioning. At some point, in fact, history and government curricula were barely distinguishable.

 2. That Futa Jallon in Guinea is the “ancestral home” of the Fulani. This fallacy is popular in southern Nigerian intellectual circles. But linguistic evidence shows that the provenance of the Fulani is traceable to what is now Senegal. In his 1971 article titled "West Atlantic: An Inventory of the Languages, their Noun-Class Systems and Consonant Alternation," Emeritus Professor David Sapir, son of famous linguist Professor Edward Sapir, found that the closest language to Fulfulde in the world is Serer, Senegal’s third largest ethnic group (after Wolof and Fulani). Serer is a Niger-Congo language like most languages in West Africa. (Léopold Sédar Senghor, Senegal’s first president who is famous for Negritude, was Serer).

Linguists have also found a smattering of Berber words in Fulfulde, which gave rise to the theory that the Fulani are the product of the ethnic fusion of North African Berber and Serer people around Senegambia. The Fulani populated Futa Jallon only in the 17th century and met the Jalonke people there.

3. That Wole Soyinka had a third-class degree from the University of Ibadan. There are two lies in this claim. The first lie is that Soyinka got a Third-Class degree. No, he earned an Upper Second-Class honors degree. The second lie is that he graduated from the University of Ibadan. He actually graduated from the University of Leeds in the UK.

He started his undergraduate studies at the then University College, Ibadan, but transferred to the University of Leeds after only two years at Ibadan. He spent another two years at Leeds to earn his BA in English Literature. Soyinka and his classmates at the University College Ibadan have repeatedly denied that he graduated from Ibadan and that he earned a Third-Class degree. But the lies have taken firm roots and are now impossible to uproot.

4. That the American government predicted Nigeria’s break-up in 2015. That’s a big fat lie. It’s true that a few private US think factories predicted that given the potentially contentious outcome of the 2015 election, there was reason to expect that Nigeria could be consumed by fratricidal in-fighting that could dissolve the union.

The most widely shared view on this was contained in a project by two Air War College students. Students in the school were given various world scenarios that could impact crude oil delivery to the US. They were then required to come up with strategies to get around this. One of the scenarios was the break-up of Nigeria. In other words, Nigerians created a “fact” out of a fictional, hypothetical college project.

5. That America calls itself “god’s own country.” As I’ve pointed out in previous columns, America’s motto isn’t “God’s own country.” It is “In God we trust.” “God’s own country” is an old American English expression for one’s place of birth— or for a beautiful, forested rural area. The “country” in the expression refers to “rural area,” not a territory occupied by a nation.

 It was usual in the past for rural, wooded small towns in America to welcome visitors with the inscription “Welcome to God’s own country” on their signposts, which in modern English would be "welcome to our beautiful small town." Some small towns in Texas (and elsewhere in the American South) still have those signs. Perhaps, that’s what caused Nigerians to assume that America’s motto is “God’s own country.”

6. That Sokoto calls itself “born to rule.” At no point in history has Sokoto ever called itself “born to rule.” As I pointed out in my January 10, 2015 column titled “The Stubborn, Undying ‘Born to Rule’ Falsehood in Nigeria’s Political Discourse,” “Sokoto State’s official license-plate catchphrase from the beginning was and still is ‘Cibiyar daular usmaniyya,’ which is Hausa for the nucleus or the navel of the Usman Danfodio caliphate. The English version of the slogan has been rendered as ‘Seat of the Caliphate,’ which I think is a great idiomatic translation.”

7. That Usman Danfodiyo brought Islam to Nigeria. No, he didn’t. The presence of Islam in Nigeria, as I pointed out previously, preceded the Usman Danfodio jihad by several centuries. What Danfodio did was to reform Islam where it already existed. And this happened only in the 19th century. The earliest record of Islamic presence in northern Nigeria (in the ancient Kanem- Borno Empire to be specific) dates back to the 9th century, that is, just two centuries away from the birth of Islam in the Arabian Peninsula.

In Hausaland, Islam had been widespread since at least the 13th century, and in Borgu, Nupe land, Yoruba land, etc. from about the 14th century.

8. That northern Christians resisted Danfodio’s attempt to convert them to Islam. This is a fusion of distinct historical memories. Usman Danfodio’s jihad did not seek to convert non-Muslims to Islam. Jihadists used non-Muslim areas as sources for slave labor. Since Islam forbids the enslavement of fellow Muslims, it wasn’t in the interest on the jihadists for surrounding non-Muslim areas to be converted to Islam. That would stop the source of cheap slave labor.

So, it would make more sense for northern Christians (who weren’t Christians at the time) to say their ancestors resisted slave raids. Their more modern ancestors resisted Ahmadu Bello’s attempts to convert them to Islam.

9. That the rise of the Alimi ruling dynasty in Ilorin is a direct outgrowth of the Usman Danfodio Jihad. Insights from the late Professor Abdullahi Smith’s writings (which are distilled from translations of the travel notes of Arab travelers who witnessed events in nineteenth-century “Nigeria”) tell us that the Ilorin jihad wasn’t a direct offshoot of the Usman Dan Fodio jihad.

Alimi, the progenitor of the current ruling family in Ilorin, was an itinerant Fulani preacher in Yoruba land whom Afonja volitionally invited to Ilorin. Afonja wanted Alimi to be his spiritual guardian (or “Alfa”) to ward off what he thought were the machinations of the Alaafin of Oyo with whom he was locked in long-drawn-out supremacy battles. After settling in Ilorin, many of Alimi’s Yoruba students from different parts of Yoruba land decided to follow him to his new home.

In time, Alimi grew so popular that Afonja feared that he would eclipse him, so he asked Alimi to leave, which caused frictions. This upheaval was coeval with, perhaps even inspired by, but was by no means the direct consequence of, the Usman Dan Fodio jihad. There is no greater evidence for this than the fact that Alimi and his disciples were not given the “flag” of the Sokoto Jihad until after at least three visits to Sokoto. They weren’t given the flag because they weren’t directly connected to the Sokoto jihad.

10. That money from the North funded oil exploration in the South. Northerners cherish this mysterious claim. But not a dime of northern Nigeria’s money contributed to oil exploration in the Niger Delta.

When oil was discovered in commercial quantities in Oloibiri in 1956, Shell bore the financial burden for the exploration. Other Euro-American oil companies later joined in oil exploration. It wasn’t until 1973 that the Nigerian federal government acquired 30 percent shares in oil companies. By 1973, Northern Nigeria had ceased to exist because it had been divided into states.

In any case, the South earned more money from palm oil, coal, and cocoa than the North did from groundnuts and cotton. If the colonial government of the 1950s were interested in using government funds to explore oil in the South, it would use the South’s money, not the North’s. But neither colonial governments nor immediate post-independence regional and federal governments invested in oil exploration. 


  1. Dear Farooq,
    You have done and continue to do Nigeria great services, and you should be specially commended for exposing ten of the popular and dangerous lies at this crucial time.
    The lies are dangerous because Nigeria seems to be revving up for a civil war and messy breakup, the most manifest evidence being the worsening insecurity. Pathetic but inaccurate histories of oppression and martyrdom, some rendition of various aspects of the civil war, designed to sour relations, provoke and annoy other ethnic groups are appearing on Face book. Education, the main hope of national integration has been practically closed down in the north where it is most needed. As insecurity rapidly increases with no evidence that anyone has a clue as how to halt the descent into chaos, the government and its supporters wallow in aggressive blind denial.
    Nigeria is too integrated from any point of view to dissolve into homogenous tribal enclaves that would live without eternal wars. Nigeria’s disintegration would strike an unfortunate blow to the current international movement towards real racial equality ignited by the murder of George Floyd. Worse of all, unending carnage of horrific proportions would be visited on the people.
    I hope the President and his team will spring into immediate action before we go off the cliff! Effective action would not be through violence or strangulation all of protests. It would be by show of love and concern and comforting responses to the cries of the people. Stoppage and exposition of lies fostering disunity are part of the important information urgently required. We need facts such as you have exposed to enliven the movement for national revival needed to avert the impending disaster. Urgently!!
    Shima K Gyoh, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.

  2. I've enjoyed the whole article especially number 8. The minority groups of the north were never targets for Islamisation but only for slave raids, like you mentioned. Even those who were captured and made slaves were not encouraged to be observant Muslims because only their labour was required. There are northern minority groups that were not even targets of slave raids like the Tivs and people of the Jos Plateau. But the internet is littered with claims about how these groups "resisted" the Jihad. The Tiv even have a narrative about how the glorious Tiv army defeated Jihad forces around a certain hill in Tivland. Pure fiction. Sir Ahmadu Bello did not, in my view, actively seek conversions but he had rewarded voluntary conversions with gifts. It was a passive thing - there were non-Muslim groups who were inspired by his personality and leadership and they chose to convert on their own. He usually sent them gifts - like some Gbagyi people of Niger state and Higgi (Kamwe) people of Bazza in Adamawa state. Prof, permit me to puncture another small lie. There is a local government in Taraba state called Sardauna LG where the Mambilla Plateau is located. Some ethnic nationalists in that area have always claimed that the name of their local government was forced upon them by the Hausa-Fulani aristocracy in the north. But the truth is that the name of the LG was derived from the name of the former Sardauna Province which was created after the people of the former Northern Trust Territory voted to join Nigeria in the 1961 plebiscite. And it is interesting to know how the province was named Sardauna. Soon after the creation of the province, Sir Ahmadu Bello visited the headquarters in Mubi and met with traditional rulers from the area. At the end of their discussions, the Sardauna asked "so what do we name the new province"? There was mostly silence after which one of the colonial officers present suggested a name which the Sardauna rejected. There was silence again before a certain traditional ruler said "Sardauna"! It was accepted by all those present. Guess who that traditional ruler was? The Chief of Mambilla Audu Baju! The name Sardauna was suggested by the then Chief of Mambilla whose people are today claiming that the name was imposed on their local government by the Hausa-Fulani! The LG was probably named Saurdauna in 1976 out of the knowledge that their own chief had suggested it as the name for Sardauna Province. My source for this information is the book The Last Man in: The End of Empire in Northern Nigeria by John Hare.

    1. Dear Bello, From your narrative,it seems the ever told history that Dan Fodio was defeated at the Ushongo hills is false.
      Please can you avail me(us) the true narrative on the raid and fall of Usman Dan Fodio?

    2. The claim about a "Battle of Ushongo Hill" of 1817 was probably first made in a statement by the Tiv cultural association Mdzough U Tiv in 2017. All references to the so-called battle that you can find on the internet are in articles written by Tiv people. There is no reference to this battle in any historical resource or any material written by a non-Tiv or non-Nigerian. There is no historical record of Usman Danfodio going to anywhere south of Hausaland. In fact, the year being mentioned for the so-called Battle of Ushongo Hill,1817, was actually the year that Danfodio died in Sokoto. And he was living in retirement since 1811 when the wars in Hausaland ended. There was no way for Danfodio to have waged war in Tivland by 1817. If there was any engagement between the Caliphate and the Tiv, it could only have been through the Emirs of Muri or Keffi who were the Caliphate emirs close to Tivland. But even records of fighting between Tiv and Muri or Keffi are difficult to find. Another point you need to note is that the Tiv people have been acephalous, that is they had no political organisation, institutions or kings until 1946 when the British created the Tor Tiv stool. Therefore, to say that such a people have fought against Danfodio more than 100 years earlier in 1817 and defeated him can only be an indication of someone's fertile imagination. The Tiv cultural association had clearly invented the Battle of Ushongo Hill so that Tiv young people could feel good about the past. It should not be regarded as anything more than that. The fall of the Sokoto Caliphate only happened in 1903 when the British came.

  3. I'm deeply stimulated. It's indeed fascinating and inspiring. Having so many told and untold lies dangling in our mouths on daily basis, is a great disservice to history.


Share your thoughts and opinions here. I read and appreciate all comments posted here. But I implore you to be respectful and professional. Trolls will be removed and toxic comments will be deleted.