Page Nav




INEC Commissioner Responds to My Article on Lawan and Akpabio

Malam Mohammed Haruna, one of INEC’s 6 national commissioners for whom I have immense respect, sent me a private message yesterday in respon...

Malam Mohammed Haruna, one of INEC’s 6 national commissioners for whom I have immense respect, sent me a private message yesterday in response to my June 17 article on INEC’s recognition of Senate President Lawan—and, I later learned, Akpabio—as APC’s senate candidate for Yobe North even though he didn’t participate in the primaries and Bashir Machina, who won the primaries, didn’t stand down for him. 

He granted my request to share this response with the public. So, here you go:

Salaam. A friend sent me your article on "Ahmed Lawal, Akpabio and INEC's Discriminatory lawlessness," which he said he was forwarding to me from a WhatsApp group he belongs to. In the article you asked, in apparent great anger, why INEC would accept Lawal's nomination but reject Akpabio since the circumstances of their nomination were similar. 

You went further to make your query personal when you singled out INEC's Chairman, Professor Mahmood Yakubu, INEC'S official spokesman, Festus Okoye, and myself to answer your angry query. 

The answer is simple: INEC has no powers to reject names sent by political parties. Primaries are the sole prerogatives of parties. INEC's responsibility is merely to monitor the primaries and make sure they abide by their own regulations, the Electoral Act & the Constitution. 

Our power in that regard rests on the fact that our reports are admissible as evidence whenever an aggrieved candidate petitions his party or the courts. It is therefore up to an aggrieved candidate to apply for the certified true copy (CTC) of our reports for presentation as evidence that his party did not abide by any or all of the three sets of regulations I mentioned.

 In the specific of Lawan & Akpabio, INEC has not picked & chosen as you said, citing media remarks by the Akwa Ibom REC. We merely received their names from the parties as stipulated in Section 29(1) of the Electoral Act. 

This does not automatically mean acceptance. The names submitted by the parties are interim. Section 29(3) provides for the publication, within a week of their submission, of the names submitted by the parties for claims & objections.

 Igini's remarks paint only a partial picture of the relevant regulations. He merely mentioned Section 31 that deals with the issue of withdrawal of candidate. For some inexplicable reason, he forgot to mention the section which mandates INEC to monitor only the primary of the State party executive recognised by the party's National Headquarters. So if anyone was picking and choosing it was Igini & not INEC. 

Also note that the final list is not due for publication until September 20th for the national elections & October 4th for the state elections, by which time all petitions by aggrieved candidates to parties or the courts would've been addressed.

Please feel free to call or text me anytime to discuss further. 

Mohammed Haruna

1 comment

  1. Mohammed Haruna, whom I much admire as a fine writer, has ably straightened the record.


Share your thoughts and opinions here. I read and appreciate all comments posted here. But I implore you to be respectful and professional. Trolls will be removed and toxic comments will be deleted.